HackerOne vs YesWeHack – Comparing Bug Bounty Solutions for Web3 Projects

HackerOne vs YesWeHack – Comparing Bug Bounty Solutions for Web3 Projects

How to Compare Bug Bounty Solutions for Web3 Companies


When your web3 business must choose a bug bounty vendor, you need to list several decision-making criteria.


You can segment those criteria into 4 groups:


Industry-Asset Match


  • Primary Expertise

  • Customer Industries

  • Top Customers

  • Competing Criteria


  • Pricing

  • Researcher count

  • Triage team

  • Review score

  • Workflow Differences


  • Integrations

  • Report Template

  • Experience & Compliance


  • Date Established

  • Compliance

  • Bug Bounty Solution Criteria Explained



    Industry-Asset Match

    Primary Expertise


    When choosing a business solution, you must understand if they’ve worked with your digital asset types.If not, then they may not have the right experience to solve your security challenges.


    For example, if you have a desktop app that runs on smart contracts, you may need to check if the solution vendor has worked before with desktop apps that run on smart contracts.The same applies to web & mobile apps as well as blockchain protocols.


    Customer Industries


    Some software features are specific to a certain industry.


    For example, Ethereum NFTs use smart contracts that run on the ERC-721 and ERC-1155 token standards. In contrast, Ethereum-based tokens leverage the ERC-20 standard. So if you are working with Ethereum NFTs, you would need to find out if the bug bounty solution providers have found vulnerabilities specifically in ERC-721 tokens.


    Top Customers


    Bug bounty solutions can have all sorts of customers.However, it’s the crucial ones that provoke thoughts such as:



    Well, if they chose them, it must have been a good decision.Would they ..

    Support the originator by clicking the read the rest link below.